Category: Reviews

  • Lena Dunham is excellent in ‘Tiny Furniture’

    Lena Dunham is excellent in ‘Tiny Furniture’

    Lena Dunham wrote, directed and starred in 'Tiny Furniture'
    Lena Dunham wrote, directed and starred in ‘Tiny Furniture’

    In what I had thought was a wholly unique experience, I spent my initial post-graduation days at home in limbo, unsure of where I was heading or if I’d even get started on that journey. But now it appears that it wasn’t just me, as Jill of all trades Lena Dunham draws on that precise situation and feeling in her breakthrough film, Tiny Furniture. This 2010 film, which won best narrative feature at South by Southwest and best first screenplay at the Independent Spirit Awards, has finally found its way to DVD and Blu ray thanks to the Criterion Collection.

    After graduating from college in Ohio, Aura Freeman (Dunham) returns to her New York City home to live with her mother Siri (actual mother Laurie Simmons) and younger sister Nadine (actual sister Grace Dunham). Neither particularly care that she’s come back, and the more into the film we get, it becomes clear that they treat Aura’s presence as more of a burden. In a strange — and fitting for the purposes of this story — coincidence, Siri and Nadine look like each other and don’t resemble Aura physically all that much. It’s almost like Aura was adopted. One has to wonder if Lena herself ever feels that way.

    She also gets back in touch with her old friend Charlotte (Jemima Kirke), who she’s known practically forever (but from the pronounced British accent,  it’s clear that she has spent the more crucial formative years of her life in that land). She is brasher than Aura and, by her own admission, has a greater sense of entitlement. It is through Charlotte that she gets a job as a restaurant hostess. Soon her eye gets caught on fellow employee Keith (David Call). He says he has a girlfriend at the moment, but that hardly lessens her liking.

    Another new man friend she meets is Jed (Alex Karpovsky), who she actually knew of before from his videos on YouTube. In a series of skits called “The Nietzschean Cowboy,” he waxes philosophic while bobbing back and forth on a rocking horse. He doesn’t live in the city; he is visiting to try to pitch his ideas to networks. When her family is away for a week, she invites him to stay over. It’s an attempt on her part to try to bond, and it seems to work. That is, until her mother and sister return.

    Lena Dunham and Jemima Kirke in 'Tiny Furniture'
    Lena Dunham and Jemima Kirke in ‘Tiny Furniture’

    What makes Tiny Furniture engaging is that it’s made by someone in touch in with what it means to be a young person in this era, but with a level of skill of someone much older. The movie looks absolutely fantastic; I would never have guessed it was made for only $25,000. Compositions of shots are done well and the use of color is very striking. In particular, the blinding whiteness of the walls in the home reinforces her purgatorial present. Similarly, the gray of the pipe she and Keith later find themselves in for a special encounter serves to enhance the emptiness they characters later feel coming out of it.

    Dunham has certainly done a great job at writing and directing here, but I feel that there’s too little talk of what a great acting job she does. Aura is magnificently portrayed by her, and while no doubt autobiographical in some degree, comes across as a character all her own. The shining moment is the kitchen argument with her mother. It’s relatively lengthy shot and Dunham manages to capture what Aura is feeling in this moment perfectly, even when acting opposite her actual mother who (I would hope) she has never been that way toward.

    Although I’m swept up in Dunhamania (yes, that was just coined by me right now), I do feel that one crucial component was not addressed: economic troubles and poor job markets. We never see Aura try for a job within her field and then failing that has to work as a hostess. The most that is shown in this regard is that her paycheck is dismally small. Without that, it feels less relevant to this particular troubled time and ignores a key problem of many recent graduates.

    This is actually the second feature film from Dunham. The first, Creative Nonfiction, is an extra. Made during her college years, it also stars Dunham and focuses on her character’s relationships with her friends while trying to come up with a story idea for a movie. The production values are certainly lower than Tiny Furniture, but some of the elements can be seen shaping up here. So too are they present in the four Dunham short films which are also extras. The other extras are Dunham’s introduction to Creative Nonfiction, a half hour conversation between her and Nora Ephron, an interview with Paul Schrader, the trailer for Tiny Furniture, and a booklet with an essay by critic Phillip Lopate.

    We’ll be seeing more of Dunham, as her TV show Girls (also with Kirke) will be on HBO soon. But Tiny Furniture shows that she has big screen magic in her, and her next effort there is greatly anticipated.

  • Paul Dano shines with Robert DeNiro in ‘Being Flynn’

    Robert DeNiro in 'Being Flynn'
    Robert DeNiro in ‘Being Flynn’

    Nick Flynn is the central character in director Paul Weitz’s (About a BoyAmerican Pie) latest film, entitled Being Flynn.  He’s also the real-life author of the memoir that was adapted by Weitz for the screen, and in the film he is portrayed by Paul Dano (Cowboys and AliensThere Will Be Blood).  Nick is a young adult who finds himself looking for a new place to live and for a new job.  The former because of his own behavior, the latter because he hasn’t quite figured out what he wants to be when he finally decides he is a grown-up.

    Nick hasn’t seen his father, Jonathan Flynn (Robert DeNiro, whose credits speak for themselves) in 18 years.  Jonathan is an ex-convict, taxi-driver, alcoholic who is convinced there have been three great American writers.  Mark Twain, J.D. Salinder and Jonathan Flynn, although his masterpiece manuscript has never been published.  But he apparently submitted something to a publisher once, because he carries the rejection letter it generated around as proof of his talent (whoever wrote it said somthing nice about his writing).

    Jonathan is forced to call Nick for assistance when he manages to get himself evicted from his apartment.  Nick is useful because he owns a pickup and has friends who will help him put his father’s belongings into storage, while Jonathan searches for a place to stay.  Turned down by everyone he knows who hasn’t fled Boston yet, Jonathan begins renting his taxi 24/7 and sleeping in it at night.  But even that falls apart thanks to his mixing his drinking with driving the taxi and soon he is sans license and place to sleep at night.

    Meanwhile, Nick has hooked up with Denise (Olivia Thrilby, Juno) who is also a soul in search of herself.  Denise happens to work at a homeless shelter and she recommends Nick seek employment there.  Not because he has any particular talents or skills they are in search of, but because she thinks it would be good for him.  Nick takes her advice and after an interesting interview with “The Captain” (Wes Studi) who runs the place, he’s added to the list of fill-in employees.  Of course, he’s called to fill-in the same night and seems to begin working fulltime almost immediately.

    Nick is exposed to a side of life he hasn’t seen before and his introduction is not without bumps, bruises and life-lessons along the way.  But those experiences pale in comparison to what happens when Jonathan shows up at the same homeless shelter in search of a place to stay.  Jonathan’s stay at the shelter, and how he and Nick deal with each other turns into a gritty, interesting story that is painful to watch at times.  Who will sink and who will survive remains to be determined, particularly as we learn more about Nick’s mother “Jody” (Julianne Moore) and the hows and whys of her death.

    DeNiro’s character of Jonathan is unidimensional and as a result he isn’t really able to display any of his immense talent.  Conversely, Dano, who has not been brilliant in his prior works, shines here.  He shows us Nick’s flaws and strengths with an understated style.  Weitz’s adaptation is excellent.

  • Tyler Perry’s ‘Good Deeds’ is too predictable

    Tyler Perry in 'Good Deeds'
    Tyler Perry in ‘Good Deeds’

    Good Deeds is the 11th film from the prolific Tyler Perry who directed, wrote, produced and stars in it.  This is the 10th time he’s starred in one of his films and this time he let the women wear the dresses.

    Perry is “Wesley Deeds”, who is the scion of a family where he represents the fifth consecutive generation of highly educated, highly successful men.  He is currently the CEO of the business his father founded, engaged to be married to the woman of his dreams, “Natalie” (Gabrielle Union), dealing with a brother who has enough problems for the entire family himself, Walter (Brian White), a mother who has had his whole life planned for him (Phylicia Rashad) and a major business headache on the horizon.

    The business problem is solvable, thanks to his right hand man “John” (Eddie Cibrian), despite Walter’s best efforts to ruin the business and everything else in his life.  Wesley’s life appears perfect.  Almost too perfect, as it is also clearly predictable, particularly to his fiancee who knows what he’s going to do before he does it.  Everything is running along smooth as silk until the morning when he arrives for work and finds Lindsay (Thandie Newton) parked in his reserved parking space.

    Lindsay is a single parent with the prototypically adorable daughter Ariel, and a life that by contrast to Wesley’s existence, is rapidly coming apart at the seams.  She can’t pay her rent.  The IRS has just garnished most of the paycheck she was counting on to make up the balance of the rent.  She’s being forced to start working nights when she had no childcare available.  And when she returns to her car, it’s about to be towed away at the insistence of Walter.

    Feeling sympathy for the woman, particularly since her daughter is sitting in the parked vehicle, Wesley stops the towing, but by the time Lindsay returns home to plead for more time to pay the rent, her belongings are already on the street.  Now she’s homeless in addition to her other problems.  She also encounters Wesley again, and suddenly realizes he’s not just some guy in a suit whose parking space she borrowed, he’s the big boss and she was none too polite to him during the towing debacle.

    The rest of the tale is very predictable and for the most part, well-executed.

    I won’t be overly nit-picky and will refrain from describing a few mistakes that won’t detract from the viewing experience.  The highly observant and those with knowledge in some narrow areas might delight in hunting them down and listing them on websites that focus on film “goofs”.  But there are only a couple and the quality of the story overcomes them with style.  There is a moral question to be answered here and it’s a very simple one.  Even if you have what everyone else thinks is everything, is that in and of itself enough for you to be happy.

    My only real quibble is the ending.  I’d have ended it a bit sooner.  Just a couple of moments, but those moments would have been far more interesting to ponder, rather than being seen.

  • ‘Thin Ice’ (original called ‘The Convincer’) is a bit disjointed

    Greg Kinnear and Billy Crudup co-star in 'Thin Ice'
    Greg Kinnear and Billy Crudup co-star in ‘Thin Ice’

    One of the many reasons Mel Brooks (who is not associated in any way, shape or form with this film) is a genius is because of something he was smart enough to ask for and get.  Remember that and we’ll revisit that fact and where the original title came from, after we look at Thin Ice.

    The title could very well be a metaphor for the life of Mickey Prohaska (Greg Kinnear), a Kenosha based insurance salesman, who we find at a convention of insurance agents where he’s leading a seminar on how to strike up conversations with potential clients.  That his best line is apparently the time-tested “Do you happen to have the time” speaks volumes about his abilities.  Hoping to sell enough policies to win a trip to his company’s anniversary retreat in Aruba, he decides to hire a go-getter who was at his seminar by the name of Bob (David Harbour) who was about to accept a job with one of Mickey’s competitors who happens to out-do Mickey by a wide margin.

    Mickey is estranged from his wife (Lea Thompson) and owes money to her son’s college fund which he took without permission and he is desperate to reconcile with her.  He’s also deeply in debt, although he’s driving a very nice car that he clearly can’t afford.  Hiring Bob turns out to have almost instant dividends, as Bob has found a number of new clients.  They include Gorvy Hauer (Alan Arkin) who lives well out of town, is a retired farmer and while none of his houseful of knick-knacks or the house itself are particularly valuable, succumbs to Mickey’s salesmanship and buys a homeowner’s policy.

    Turns out though that Gorvy does own something valuable.  An old violin that has been appraised by an expert (Bob Balaban) for $25,000 and Mickey decides that he needs the money more than Gorvy, so he is going to steal and sell the violin.  The problem is that good old Bob has pointed out to Gorvy that if he were to purchase an alarm system for his house, the premiums would be lowered.  It just so happens that as Gorvy is about to go visit his sister (she’s very ill), the locksmith (Billy Crudup) shows up to finish the installation.  So Mickey can’t get back into Gorvy’s house to take the violin (he’s rigged a not too clever substitute to leave in its place) without the help of Randy (Crudup).

    What happens from the point where Randy agrees to open the house to Mickey until the climax can’t be told without spoiling the entire movie.  It’s a fun ride and if Tailslate were to have half-ratings, this would go up to 2.5 popcorns because of the twists and turns that follow.  They are the best part of the movie.

    At the end though, the audience is given a look back at the events they’ve just seen, and what they think they saw may well not be what was actually going on.  This adds to the disjointed feel of the picture and the explanation for this may well be found in a lettter that director/writer Jill Sprecher did not intend the audience to see what they actually saw.  The film she delivered was cut by some 20 odd minutes, with things she intended to be in the film removed, and things she intended to be removed re-inserted.  I would be very curious to see her original edit and suspect it would be much more enjoyable to view.

    Now let’s go back to one of the many things that made Mel Brooks such a genius.  One of them was that he was smart enough to ensure that when he made movies like Blazing Saddles, he had the privilege of the final cut.  So when studio executives wanted things removed, their wishes were ignored.  As a result, the brilliance of his vision was delivered intact to the audience.  That clearly didn’t happen with Thin Ice.

    Oh, that original title.  I decided I can’t tell you what it means in this context.  But it will become clear if you choose to see the movie, I promise.

  • ‘Wanderlust’ goes for cheap easy laughs

    Paul Rudd and Jennifer Aniston in 'Wanderlust'
    Paul Rudd and Jennifer Aniston in ‘Wanderlust’

    There was minor controversy in Hollywood about the fact that Jennifer Aniston signed a contract that included her doing a topless scene.  The good news is that she ended up doing the scene.  The bad news is that what is ultimately shown on the big screen is digitally altered to blur out any ability to “see” anything.

    Wanderlust is a familiar tale.  George (Paul Rudd) and Linda (Aniston) are a married couple living happily in New York City.  Of course, he’s not happy with the job he works so hard at.  He actually hates it.  She still hasn’t found her calling, and her latest effort at employment does not live up to her expectations.  When you add in the fact that they’ve just purchased their first apartment and are overextended financially, you have a recipe for impending disaster.

    Sure enough, George finds himself out of work through a cliched contrivance and with the failure of Linda’s newest venture, they can’t afford to remain in NYC.  Luckily, George’s brother Rick (Ken Marino) is doing very well down South in Atlanta and he tells George to come live with him and his wife Marissa in his beautiful big house, and he’ll employ George in the business that he owns.

    Paul Rudd and Jennifer Aniston co-star in 'Wanderlust'
    Paul Rudd and Jennifer Aniston co-star in ‘Wanderlust’

    So the couple set course for Atlanta with all their belongs in their compact car.  The journey itself will generate a laugh or two but the real humor begins when Linda says they have to stop as she’s just too tired to go on.  The handy-dandy GPS locates a nearby B&B and they stop at Elysium.

    Elysium turns out to be the communal home of a 60s survivor named Carvin, whose also known as Lion (Alan Alda who is sorely underutilized), who has assembled a modern set of young and middle-aged folks who support themselves by running a food stand at the gate, renting out the “good” bedroom in the big house on the property that Carvin owns.

    They profess to not having a “leader” but clearly exercising the leader role is Seth (Justin Theroux).  The couple spends an amazing night at Elysium in spite of some of the quirks of the population and in the morning, departs for Rick’s Atlanta home.  An example of the quirky people one can find at Elysium is an aspiring author who is also a nudist, who must wear a big “pouch sac” when he’s stomping his own grapes for wine.

    The job, living under Rick’s roof and his alcoholic, depressed wife Marissa (Michaela Watkins), eventually drive George to bolt from his brother’s house, wife Linda in tow, heading back to Elysium.  Linda isn’t happy about being there and wants to leave, but eventually they resolve to give it two weeks and then decide.

    Of course there are issues.  “Free love” is one of the community standards and Eva (Malin Ackerman) has the hots for George.  Seth clearly wants to add Linda to his long list of conquests and as a result of his desire for Linda, he does go out of his way to make things a little rough on George.  Adding to the tension is the fact that the ownership of the property is in dispute and Corvin can’t remember where he left the deed, and there are people who want to develop and build on the property.

    There is actualy nudity in spite of the digital alterations to Ms Aniston, and the humor ranges from mildly amusing to laugh out loud hysterical.  But there’s the feeling that something just isn’t right here, with George and Linda, as well as Seth.  The ultimate resolutions are satisfying enough, but at the end all you are left with is the typical happy-ending and the memory of some hearty laughter.

    The basic premise is sound, but the execution got lost in the decision to go for easy laughs at the expense of waving genitals in George’s face and violations of his privacy.  Oh yes, don’t walk out the minute the credits start to roll.  The little “bit” that’s there after the credits are done isn’t brilliant, but it’s worth a look.

  • ‘Act of Valor’ is great on action light on story

    Soldiers on the move in 'Act of Valor'
    Soldiers on the move in ‘Act of Valor’

    Tango is the phonetic alphabet word for the letter “T”.  It’s also a term used by the special operations units of the U.S. military to describe terrorists and their supporters.

    Operators is a term used by SEALs and members of the “Delta” force to describe Special Forces personnel who go out into the world to carry out their highly classified missions.

    Act of Valor is all about how the elite Navy SEAL operators take out tangos in large numbers while working to keep the U.S. safe from an attack that willmake 9/11 look like a minor incident.   The film features real-life SEALs portraying the highly trained, superbly skilled operators.

    The basic story is supposedly “woven” together from five real world missions that were carried out by SEALs in the post 9/11 era.  The script, from Kurt Johnstad, is fairly generic.  There is a terrorist named Abu Shabal (Jason Cottle) who is a Muslim convert from Chechnya who was the childhood friend of Christo (Alex Veadov) who happens to be a smuggler and arms merchant.

    Shabal operates primarily in the Pacific, most notably the Philippines and Indonesia and has a number of dedicated followers willing to die carrying out terrorist attacks planned by Shabal.  The CIA, although fairly unaware of Shabal, is keeping an eye on Christo’s operations in Costa Rica.

    Real-life Navy SEALs hit the big screen in 'Act of Valor'
    Real-life Navy SEALs hit the big screen in ‘Act of Valor’

    Meanwhile, the SEALs are at home in the San Diego area, about to go on a deployment aboard a Navy ship.  Lieutenant Roark is the leader of the “Bandito” platoon and his Chief Petty Officer Dave and he get together to discuss things before the deployment, during which Roark lets Dave in on a piece of good news involving his family.  There is a going away picnic/beach outing involving the entire team, which includes an addition in Senior Chief Otto. Otto was an operator before being wounded and subsequently transferring into intelligence gathering.  His expertise at interrogation is just one of the reasons the Lt. asked that he be added to the Bandito platoon being deployed.

    A CIA operative (Roselyn Sanchez) is involved in the CIA effort to monitor Christo and her cover is blown, resulting in her being captured by Christo’s thugs.  When the U.S. becomes aware of her capture, who else would be tasked to rescue her but Lt. Roark’s unit?

    What makes Act of Valor worth viewing is front and center from this point forward.  The directors spent 50 some odd weeks spread over two years filming real SEAL training operations that involved live ammunition.  The result is a fantastic set of action sequences that illustrate just how precise and overwhelming SEAL operations can be.

    Aided in the recovery mission by two SWCC (acronyms and other useful terms listed in a moment) boats and their crews, the amazing headshots and awesome firepower they bring to bear, along with smart camera work result in very satisfying, realistic action.  These elements are present throughout the remainder of the story and ensuing engagements between the SEALs and the various tangos they encounter en route to the final confrontation between the team and Abu Shabal, being aided near the end by members of a Mexican drug cartel.

    What makes Act of Valor a tiny bit difficult to watch is the downside of using real-life SEALs in these key roles in a film.  They are operators, not actors.  As a result, the scenes that aren’t fraught with the intense action that will keep you on the edge of your seat throughout most of the movie are a bit stunted.  But this is a film you don’t go watch in order to explore the range of emotions that an actor can put on display.  You’re there to munch on some good popcorn and get into the action.

    In that respect, Act of Valor delivers.

    Now as promised, a few acronyms and terms that might help in viewing the film:

    QRF — Quick reaction force

    SWCC — Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen

    Trident — the gold badge SEALs wear on their dress uniforms

  • ‘This Means War’ earns a few good laughs

    ‘This Means War’ earns a few good laughs

    Chris Pine and Tom Hardy in 'This Means War'
    Chris Pine and Tom Hardy in ‘This Means War’

    Take some exciting, although not realistic action sequences.  Let simmer and slowly stir in some romance.  Then add some sharp comic dialogue and writing.  Cover and cook for 98 minutes and you have the recipe for the newest entry from director McG, This Means War.

    “FDR” (Chris Pine) and “Tuck” (Tom Hardy) are CIA agents who open the film by failing to get their man, although they manage to retrieve some device they were sent to get.  Upon return to their base of operations in Los Angeles, they’re benched by their boss “Collins” (Angela Bassett whose talents are wasted in a small, thankless role).  FDR, a perennial bachelor suggests that its time for Tuck to stop mooning over his ex-wife and get back into the dating pool.  He ends up checking out a computer dating website that just got a new profile for “Lauren” (Reese Witherspoon) who had no intention of trying computer dating.  Lauren, who works in consumer product testing had her profile loaded to the website by her well-meaning friend “Trish” (Chelsea Handler).

    Lauren and Tuck agree to meet and FDR insists on keeping overwatch on FDR, who is more of a BFF than Nicole Richie ever was to Paris Hilton, from a nearby video store.  They arrange a signal for him to abort his mission and when he receives it, he starts “hunting” for a woman among the video store’s customers and soon scopes out a target for himself.  Unfortunately for both he and his friend Tuck, FDR’s target turns out to be Lauren who’d stopped to get herself a video on her way home.  Through perhaps the most contrived moment in the film, they end up agreeing to get together again.

    Tom Hardy (l.), Chris Pine, and Reese Witherspoon co-star in 'This Means War'
    Tom Hardy (l.), Chris Pine, and Reese Witherspoon co-star in ‘This Means War’

    But when Tuck and FDR learn that they are both in pursuit of the same woman, they pull out all the stops in order to monitor what each other is doing with Lauren.  Given current technology, this provides a few interesting and humorous moments.  Naturally both men find themselves increasing attracted to Lauren and this conflict is the center story here.  The requisite secret agent backstory revolves around the bad guy they missed in the opening, although they managed to kill his brother.  Obviously, he wants payback.

    The test of an action film is the action sequences.  Here, This Means War satisifes sometimes and disappoints sometimes.  The test of romance need not be defined and here, the film is at its worst.  But, the test of a comedy is simple.  Do you laugh? This Means War had me laughing out loud in more than a few places.  The best humorous moments of this make it far better than other recent romantic comedies and when you add in some satisfying action, the result is better than I had expected.  It’s not brilliant, nothing that Witherspoon, Pine or Hardy will take much pride in, but “This Means War” will entertain its audience.

    The best part of this movie is reserved for fans of Chelsea Handler, star of her own late-night talk-show on E! Entertainment.  Handler also has a show about the goings-on back-stage at her weeknight program on E!, and also has a new sit-com based on her life that she co-stars in (she doesn’t play herself, someone else plays her and she plays her own older sister) on NBC.  While the sitcom hasn’t won much favor with the critics, in This Means War, any fan of Handler’s talk-show will love the inside jokes that are to be found in her character’s speech and actions.  Her dialogue might have come out of any of her monologues on her talk-show.  Trish’s advice and counsel to Lauren in This Means War might well be from the next best-selling book we will get from Handler.

  • ‘Godzilla’ roars with Criterion Collection’s Blu-ray beautiful black-and-white

    Godzilla (Gojira) first trampled through Tokyo in 1954
    Godzilla (Gojira) first trampled through Tokyo in 1954

    Godzilla, the creature who was baptized in the fire of the H-bomb and survived. This film icon that’s crossed international and generational lines has been with us for nearly 60 years. Films, video games, television, and music videos inside Japan and out continue to draw inspiration from it. Now the 1954 film that started it all has been added to the Criterion Collection in a new digital restoration on DVD and Blu-ray.

    This film has no giant butterflies to contend with as later installments do. But what’s here is a very poignant statement on the dangers of nuclear proliferation, especially in regards to a nation that has suffered from it like no other.

    It all starts with a scene that not-so-subtly references the real-life Lucky Dragon No. 5 incident, in which America tested a hydrogen bomb in the Japanese seas while a fishing boat was in the vicinity (one of the crew eventually died from the radiation).  Another boat is sent out to investigate, and it too is destroyed. But not from the hydrogen bomb.

    Godzilla, a prehistoric creature who had been trapped beneath the ocean floor, is now freed by the blast. His rampage ultimately brings him to Tokyo, where the city is no match for the monster. The scenes that show the aftermath for the victims are very moving. If it wasn’t clear enough already whatGodzilla metaphorically represents, it comes through here.

    Godzilla
    Godzilla

    And yet, the character has an element of sympathy to him. After all, he was disturbed from his resting place and did nothing wrong in the first place for that to happen. His anger against humanity is justifiable, albeit misdirected. However, being the primitive animal he is, he was no way of knowing who truly is responsible and deserves his ferocity. He cannot distinguish good from evil, innocent from guilty; he attacks them all the same.  Much like a nuclear bomb, really.

    You may have noticed that I have Raymond Burr mentioned in the cast. He is the star of a reedit made for America called Godzilla, King of the Monsters!, which is included here as an extra. Scenes are taken from the original (except now dubbed) and events play out practically the same, but with added footage of Burr as an American reporter covering the story as it develops. Although the emotional impact is still present, this is by far inferior to the original film. Still, it’s nice to have here.

    Both films are given commentaries from David Kalat, a film historian who is the author of A Critical History and Filmography of Toho’s Godzilla Series. Other extras include interview segments, anywhere from 10 to 50 minutes, with star Akira Takarada, who plays Ogata; Haruo Nakajima, the actor in the Godzilla suit; Akira Ifukube, the score composer; special effects technicians Yoshio Irie (model builder) and Eizo Kaimai (Godzilla suit co-constructor); and film critic Tadao Sato. Also present are a featurette on the photographic effects introduced by effects director Koichi Kawakita and effects photographer Motoyoshi Tomioka, the illustrated audio essay The Unluckiest Dragon read by Greg Pflugfelder of Columbia University, and the trailers for both movies. Finally, there’s a booklet with an essay by critic J. Hoberman.

    Godzilla is much more than a mere monster movie. It will easily endure for 60 years more, and beyond.

  • ‘The Vow’ should probably be forgotten

    Rachel McAdams and Channing Tatum in 'The Vow'
    Rachel McAdams and Channing Tatum in ‘The Vow’

    There are few phrases that will make me cringe as badly as the words “Inspired by True Events” do when I see them on a movie screen before a film begins.  The fear that liberties taken by those who adapted the true story for the screen will harm rather than enhance the presentation of the tale is a fear born of long experience.  Those fears come home to roost in The Vow.

    The Vow is a cloying tale that wants to drive your emotions for you as you see their story unfold. Starring Channing Tatum as Leo and Rachel McAdams as Paige, it follows this young married couple whose blissful existence is shattered when they are involved in a car accident that largely erases Paige’s memory.

    Turns out that Paige, who was an art student when she serendipitiously met her husband-to-be, and is now a successful artist, was a much different woman before they met.  She was a law student and engaged to a man she’d known for a long time before dumping him, turning her back on her suburb-residing family and moving into the city of Chicago.  This is all brought to the forefront after the accident, which has robbed Paige of memory of Leo.  She can’t remember their wedding, their home, or even the charming “meet-cute” that brought them together (credit for “meet-cute” to Nancy Meyers’ smart film The Holiday).

    Once Paige is ready to return to the urban dwelling she shares with Leo, her parents Bill (Sam Neill) and Rita (Jessica Lange) attempt to intervene.  They want Paige to return home with them, to a home she remembers, rather than go off with someone who seems a complete stranger to them.  Her doctor, Dr. Fishman (Wendy Crewson in a brief, strong effort) advises against this, suggesting that going back to her prior existence is the best way for her memories to return.

    The return home is problematic and the problems multiply.  The moment in time to which Paige’s memories are tuned into was a moment where she was still engaged to Jeremy, still a law school student and wore her hair much differently, and the changes that had taken place in her life are things she is not immediately comfortable with.  As things worsen, with the continued absence of her memories of Leo, she chooses to move back home with her parents.

    While the excuse is that her sister’s upcoming wedding and her mother’s need for help with this and a myriad of other things, the truth is she’s not gaining any comfort level with Leo.

    The rest is as easily predicted as any Nicholas Sparks novel and the fans and detractors of film adaptations of his works may well believe he is the one to credit or blame for what ends up on the screen.  We can fix the blame on the writers, which based on the credits include director Michael Sucsy. A view of his film resume leaves one wondering just what went on in the interim from his time as a PA onDeep Impact and his return to film some 10 years later in Grey Gardens.

    The leads are very good, even excellent when one considers the pedestrian material they are forced to work with.  McAdams is capable of charming any device with a lens and Tatum delivers the emotional conflict a man who loves a woman who can no longer return that love would be expected to experience.

    I didn’t want the 104 minutes of my life back, but there were other things I might have preferred spending them on.

  • ‘Red Tails’ soars – but lacks real historic context

    Bombers take to the skies over Europe in 'Red Tails'
    Bombers take to the skies over Europe in ‘Red Tails’

    If you are a serious history buff, or want detailed information on the history and training of the famed Tuskegee Airmen of World War II, then director Anthony Hemingway’s Red Tails is not the best choice available to you.

    But don’t let that persuade you to skip this effective telling of the action and heroism faced by the all African-American unit of fighter pilots and their maintenance crews, along with the discrimination they continued to face in an era where they were finally given a chance to fight for their country.  Just as long as they didn’t try to eat at the “Whites-only” lunch counters or drink in any Officer’s Clubs.

    George Lucas deserves a special award for shepherding this project through 23 years of development hell, finally pulling out his own checkbook and financing the picture when Hollywood executives told him they didn’t know how to market this kind of film.

    To some, this may be as close to Star Wars — Episode VII as we will ever be privileged to view, with stellar aerial footage based on the real-life exploits of the 332nd Fighter Group. This all-black unit began its action in World War II with hand-me-down aircraft, parts and missions that involved no real opportunity to mix things up with the Luftwaffe’s pilots.  So pilots like Joe “Lightning” Little (David Oyelowo), Marty “Easy” Julian (Nate Parker), Ray “Junior” Gannon (Tristan Wilds) and David “Deke” Watkins (Marcus T. Paulk) suddenly appear on-screen with no background about how black men came to be officers, gentlemen and fighter pilots more than 20 years before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 supposedly ended the days of when they had to sit at the back of the bus.

    Cuba Gooding Jr. stars in 'Red Tails'
    Cuba Gooding Jr. stars in ‘Red Tails’

    “Lightning” becomes the focal point of the flying and the story of these men, as he is clearly the most gifted aviator among them.  He also manages to get involved with a local Italian woman (Daniela Ruah) who doesn’t speak English.  He of course, does not speak Italian, but the language of amore appears to conquer all.  But it is Lightning’s judgment that is called into question, given bad choices he makes and he nearly loses the opportunity to fly against the Germans he longs to shoot down.

    One of those bad choices nearly costs him his wings.  Easy is the leader of the small group of pilots.  Outranked by Major Stance (Cuba Gooding Jr.) and Colonel Bullard (Terrence Howard), Easy is in charge when they are airborne and it’s a duty and responsibility he takes seriously.  Especially when a few of his own choices become problematic.  He find his own way of coping and it is something that doesn’t bode well for anyone’s future.

    We watch as Colonel Bullard fights in Washington, D.C. for the chance for his pilots to do more than shoot at trucks and other targets of low-importance.  Finally, the opportunity arises when white fighter pilots who are supposed to be flying cover for bombing missions suffer from target fixation and leave their assigned bombers alone to chase German fighter planes.

    Their eagerness to shoot down fighters comes at a serious cost, as once they abandon the bombers, those big, slow planes are easy marks for other German fighter planes.  Including the first jet fighters in history, the ME-262s.

    General Luntz (former Major Dad star Gerald McRaney) wants to give the 332nd a crack at flying cover for the bomber missions and gives Colonel Bullard’s pilots their long-sought opportunity.  As part of the deal, Colonel Bullard manages to obtain new P-51 aircraft for his pilots, and their crews paint the tails of these new planes a bright red.  Their initial mission is a great success as Colonel Bullard and Major Stance convince “Easy”, “Lightning” and the rest of the importance of staying with the bombers.  The bombers themselves ask that the “Red Tails” fly cover for them on future missions, as they know they will be safe under their watch.

    This could have been a great film.  It suffers from the absence of the history of how these bold men came to be given the chance to fight for what they believe in.  It only touches briefly on the racism and discrimination they faced.  And in the end, it doesn’t do justice to the heroism of the Tuskegee Airmen, who were awarded 95 (the film claims 96) Distinguished Flying Crosses.  But as previously mentioned, the aerial sequences are wonderfully shot.  ACM (Air Combat Manuevering) or “dogfighting” as it is more commonly known is on display and it is a treat to view.

    Buy a box of popcorn and after you view this, pick up the 1995 Made for HBO film on these brave men and learn their real story.