Tag: Reese Witherspoon

  • ‘This Means War’ earns a few good laughs

    ‘This Means War’ earns a few good laughs

    Chris Pine and Tom Hardy in 'This Means War'
    Chris Pine and Tom Hardy in ‘This Means War’

    Take some exciting, although not realistic action sequences.  Let simmer and slowly stir in some romance.  Then add some sharp comic dialogue and writing.  Cover and cook for 98 minutes and you have the recipe for the newest entry from director McG, This Means War.

    “FDR” (Chris Pine) and “Tuck” (Tom Hardy) are CIA agents who open the film by failing to get their man, although they manage to retrieve some device they were sent to get.  Upon return to their base of operations in Los Angeles, they’re benched by their boss “Collins” (Angela Bassett whose talents are wasted in a small, thankless role).  FDR, a perennial bachelor suggests that its time for Tuck to stop mooning over his ex-wife and get back into the dating pool.  He ends up checking out a computer dating website that just got a new profile for “Lauren” (Reese Witherspoon) who had no intention of trying computer dating.  Lauren, who works in consumer product testing had her profile loaded to the website by her well-meaning friend “Trish” (Chelsea Handler).

    Lauren and Tuck agree to meet and FDR insists on keeping overwatch on FDR, who is more of a BFF than Nicole Richie ever was to Paris Hilton, from a nearby video store.  They arrange a signal for him to abort his mission and when he receives it, he starts “hunting” for a woman among the video store’s customers and soon scopes out a target for himself.  Unfortunately for both he and his friend Tuck, FDR’s target turns out to be Lauren who’d stopped to get herself a video on her way home.  Through perhaps the most contrived moment in the film, they end up agreeing to get together again.

    Tom Hardy (l.), Chris Pine, and Reese Witherspoon co-star in 'This Means War'
    Tom Hardy (l.), Chris Pine, and Reese Witherspoon co-star in ‘This Means War’

    But when Tuck and FDR learn that they are both in pursuit of the same woman, they pull out all the stops in order to monitor what each other is doing with Lauren.  Given current technology, this provides a few interesting and humorous moments.  Naturally both men find themselves increasing attracted to Lauren and this conflict is the center story here.  The requisite secret agent backstory revolves around the bad guy they missed in the opening, although they managed to kill his brother.  Obviously, he wants payback.

    The test of an action film is the action sequences.  Here, This Means War satisifes sometimes and disappoints sometimes.  The test of romance need not be defined and here, the film is at its worst.  But, the test of a comedy is simple.  Do you laugh? This Means War had me laughing out loud in more than a few places.  The best humorous moments of this make it far better than other recent romantic comedies and when you add in some satisfying action, the result is better than I had expected.  It’s not brilliant, nothing that Witherspoon, Pine or Hardy will take much pride in, but “This Means War” will entertain its audience.

    The best part of this movie is reserved for fans of Chelsea Handler, star of her own late-night talk-show on E! Entertainment.  Handler also has a show about the goings-on back-stage at her weeknight program on E!, and also has a new sit-com based on her life that she co-stars in (she doesn’t play herself, someone else plays her and she plays her own older sister) on NBC.  While the sitcom hasn’t won much favor with the critics, in This Means War, any fan of Handler’s talk-show will love the inside jokes that are to be found in her character’s speech and actions.  Her dialogue might have come out of any of her monologues on her talk-show.  Trish’s advice and counsel to Lauren in This Means War might well be from the next best-selling book we will get from Handler.

  • Reese Witherspoon’s great performance is wasted in ‘Vanity Fair’

    Reese Witherspoon’s great performance is wasted in ‘Vanity Fair’

    James Purefoy and Reese Witherspoon in 'Vanity Fair'
    James Purefoy and Reese Witherspoon in ‘Vanity Fair’

    Let me start this one off by just saying now that it’s going to be short. This is one of those reviews I struggle through, because I have nothing nice to say about this movie.

    Vanity Fair is the kind of period piece I never understand. For the most part, these type of movies are melodramatic nonsense filled with unlikable characters playing the social society game with a lack of compassion and filled with greed. And I just can never grasp why people find them fascinating.

    Here we follow the efforts of Rebecca Sharp as she uses sex and wit to slither up the social ladder in the late 1800s England. The story follows the people she steps on as she ascends that ladder, eventually falls off it, then struggles to ascend once more.

    I really am sitting here at the keyboard struggling to talk about this movie. It has been quite some time since I’ve been witness to a production that so disgusted me. But what makes this experience unique is that it had nothing to do with the actors in it, the direction, or anything about the production itself. The problem for me was quite simply the story and characters.

    Reese Witherspoon in 'Vanity Fair'
    Reese Witherspoon in ‘Vanity Fair’

    There isn’t one redeemable person in the entire film. There are generally just two types of people here: the disgustingly arrogant elite, and the people they abuse and use. And while there are perhaps a few characters who are not morally corrupt, they are ultimately dramatically stupid that you cannot possibly feel sympathy for them.

    Sharp is someone you’re suppose to feel something for, and Vanity Fair does attempt repeatedly to manipulate you into feeling sorry for her. In one scene, she attends a high society gathering where the majority of women openly turn their backs on her. Eventually, one of them takes pity on her, but we the audience know — or should know — that this woman’s noble efforts are wasted. Sharp is not really deserving of sympathy because she is the very person the other women believe her to be: a gold-digger who manipulates her way into rich society. A shallow, selfish woman. And what makes this movie so frustrating is that she never changes. In the end, through all her troubles and everything that she has lost, she remains vain and empty.

    It’s as if the movie attempts to con the audience in the same manner that Sharp cons those around her.

    Visually, the film is beautiful. Well directed, and Reese Witherspoon does a strong job as Rebecca Sharp. All of this grandeur, however, is wasted on a film that has no redeeming elements to it.

  • Reese Witherspoon channels Goldie Hawn in ‘Legally Blonde’

    Reese Witherspoon channels Goldie Hawn in ‘Legally Blonde’

    Reese Witherspoon is perfect in 'Legally Blonde'
    Reese Witherspoon is perfect in ‘Legally Blonde’

    During the holidays, I was given the honor of watching over my seven-year-old niece, Amanda. We played Playstation, went to the movies, and watched TV together. It was great.

    We journey to Blockbuster one day, and she was allowed to pick a movie to rent. She was torn between three films, but picked Legally Blondebecause it was the only one of the three she hadn’t seen. Plus, I wouldn’t let her rent Killer Vampires — the kid loves horror films.

    So, out of curiosity, I sat and watched the hit film. In the end, I found it was actually enjoyable. There were a few genuine laughs.

    The basic story follows Elle Woods (Reese Witherspoon) as she tries to prove to her ex-boyfriend that she could be a smart, politician’s wife. She follows him to Harvard Law School, where she successfully enrolls.

    However, she discovers that law school is harder than she expected, and finds that self-worth is more important than the affections of a wishy-washy guy.

    I liked this film. It was simple, light-hearted and innocent.

    Okay, the love story-line was predictable, but that was this film’s only real weakness. It also does a nice job of establishing that while Witherspoon’s character may appear dumb, she clearly is not. She simply has some misplaced priorities.

    What I also liked is how the film ended showing that her character has grown because of her experiences, but did not insult the kind of person she was when the film began.

    Witherspoon is a terrific talent, and while I haven’t really watched all of her films, she’s always proven herself to be a fine actor. For example, I thought Election was too long and a tad boring, but she was very good in it. I would hope that she will not shy away from some more challenging roles in the future.

    Legally Blonde is a movie Goldie Hawn would have made had she been 30 years younger. It is not unlike Protocol or Private Benjamin. I would like to think that Witherspoon is not attempting to mimic her career, because she has much more to offer.

    I’m not saying that Hawn was a bad actress, she wasn’t. But, with the exception of Sugerland Express, she basically stuck with light-hearted comedies. I would like to see Witherspoon stretch herself a little further than that.