Tag: Linda Sheridan

  • Q&A with Camilla Belle & Rebecca Miller

    Q&A with Camilla Belle & Rebecca Miller

    Camilla Belle in 'The Ballad of Jack Rose'
    Camilla Belle in ‘The Ballad of Jack Rose’

    I recently had the chance to participate in a roundtable session with the director and cast of The Ballad of Jack and Rose, who couldn’t have been a nicer group of people. They were very kind, open and affable, taking time to personally greet each of us, shaking our hands.

    The session was split into two parts, the first being with the film’s female lead, 18-year old Camilla Belle and the writer/director, Rebecca Miller (the second was with Daniel Day Lewis and Catherine Keener, which you can read here). Belle is even more stunning in person than she is on screen. Miller was animated and articulate, with beautiful long brown hair and white-blue liquid eyes.

    ——

    Question: There’s a message in the film to dysfunctional kids and families everywhere. There’s so much in dealing with kids getting over their parents’ baggage to a degree…

    Rebecca Miller: I don’t have a message so much, but I am talking about that in part, how family dynamics can go wrong. For example, Kathleen’s compulsion to try to do good by getting her son Rodney to slim down. Her child is her mirror, showing her an image she doesn’t want to see. They (kids) start out as mirror images of their parents and then they don’t have to be that anymore. Rodney and Rose get out, in different ways.

    Q: How did it feel to go through a girl’s awakening on film?

    Camilla Belle: It was sort of happening to me personally at that time as well, we were both 16. I was on the brink of that ‘coming-of-age’ time in my life. For Rose, and for me, it was sudden, not gradual, like for everyone else. It didn’t really bother me because I was in it. I didn’t think about it. It went really fast. But it made sense.

    Q: What was the most difficult scene for you to shoot?

    CB: I was pretty comfortable most of the time. I’d say the hair-cutting scene was a bit nerve-racking.

    Q: Was your hair actually quite that long, or were you wearing extensions?

    CB: It was actually that long!

    Q: Shooting the film in sequence, how did that help you get into the moment?

    CB: For me everything in the film was gradually building, becoming more emotional, so it helped. At the end of it all I was emotionally drained. At that point I took Rose’s view, that this has to happen, there’s nothing I can do about it. It was a huge shock. I’ve never had hair that short in my life! I think the rest of the cast and crew were mourning my haircut more than I was! But after a while, I felt liberated, I learned to embrace it.

    RM: That was the idea, to help that process along. The stakes keep getting higher and higher, everyone gets emotionally charged, this happens, this happens. To do that in a disjointed way… we could have done it, but shooting in sequence added to it. There was a kind of liberation for the actors, they were on a roll. Even the crew were listening, as they were holding the mike. People got plugged into it.

    Q: How long was the shoot?

    RM: Seven weeks.

    Q: How much of what Rose went through is an extension of your childhood?

    RM: Fundamentally, I have to say this is a work of imagination. But embedded in a work is shards of the writer’s self. There are elements of my childhood. But those elements are universal. Especially the terrible fear of your parents dying when you’re young. If they die, your world is going to end. There’s an emotional core there, a wellspring, I kept feeding from over the years, kept the film alive.

    Rebecca Miller with Daniel Day-Lews on the set of 'The Ballad of Jack & Rose'
    Rebecca Miller with Daniel Day-Lews on the set of ‘The Ballad of Jack & Rose’

    Q: Was it difficult to shoot your husband dying?

    RM: Yes, actually, yes it was. It’s kind of wonderful in a way. You’re still married, still husband and wife, but, you have to take some distance from each other in order to do this work, for him to maintain his imagination in this world and in this relationship, and for me to see all this with some distance and objectivity. It’s ultimately good for a marriage, to be able to see each other in a different way.

    Q: Were you excited when he agreed to do the film?

    RM: Yes, I was very excited.

    Q: Did you discover something about him on this film as a person?

    RM: I experienced some things about him in a closer range (chuckle). The intensity of his concentration. The way he’s so complete in the details of his character. It’s wonderful to work with somebody with that level of commitment. But that affected everybody. I could see and feel how Camilla was growing and learning.

    CB: Working with him is a dream come true. I’m an observer, and just seeing how dedicated and how he knows his character backwards and forwards is so admirable, it made me really want to bring my character justice. By knowing your character so well you can’t go wrong. All of us kind of fell into that.

    Q: You hadn’t had that experience in other films you’d done before?

    CB: Not really. I’d taken three years off to live as a normal person, so this was my first time back into it, and it was kind of shocking, but then it was fun. Because I was able to submerge myself into the character, I didn’t have to go back and forth. You don’t have to work hard to bring emotions. It all just comes naturally, you’re there living it.

    Q: Tell us about the location.

    RM: One of our producers told us about Charlottetown (Prince Edward Island). I fell in love with it. I missed my connecting flight every time I was trying to get out there! There was nothing convenient about it! But it was just the most beautiful place. We really felt like we were at the edge of the world. The land really affected that communal feeling everybody had.

    Q: Tell us why you cast Camilla.

    RM: We saw 400 girls, and I was very nervous. Camilla, physically, was really striking to us, and she had a kind of innocence, especially at that time, it was unique. And she had this raw emotional power. She had a real connection to her emotions, a real understanding. She listens very well, and she’s very aware, and to be that open, that porous, letting things come in, that’s the mark of a great actor. We were really lucky.

    Q: What did you like best about your character?

    CB: When I first read the script, what stuck me was that you really didn’t have to control yourself, your feelings. like if you were angry at someone, you could just push them out the window, and I thought, I wish I could do that and not care! And living in the city you can’t do that, you have consequences. The world that she lives in is just magical, one of the most beautiful places I’ve ever seen.

    Q: Were any scenes improvised?

    RM: No, not really.

    Q: If there’s one thing you want the audience to take
    away from the film, what would it be?

    RM: One thing is hard. One thing… is that love is complicated.

    Q: How old are you Camilla?

    CB: I’m 18, I’m going to graduate high school in a few months. (Everybody cheered.)

  • Q&A with Daniel Day-Lewis & Catherine Keener

    Q&A with Daniel Day-Lewis & Catherine Keener

    Daniel Day-Lewis and Camilla Belle in 'The Ballad of Jack & Rose'
    Daniel Day-Lewis and Camilla Belle in ‘The Ballad of Jack & Rose’

    As I said in the Q&A with Camilla Belle and Rebecca Miller, I recently had the chance to participate in a roundtable session regarding the film, The Ballad of Jack and Rose, which opens today. Everyone was so kind, and after the interviews with them we had the opportunity to talk with Daniel Day-Lewis and Catherine Keener, two of the film’s stars.

    The two came in refreshed and relaxed, exchanging handshakes with the entire roundtable. Catherine had slightly fractured one of her wrists but was in good spirits. Statuesque Daniel appeared as if he was ready to hit the pubs, looking comfy in a wool sweater, his shoulder length-hair tucked under a cap, with piercing blue eyes and a winning smile under a mustache and beard.

    ——

    Question: There’s a continuity to the roles you play that has to do with you being an outsider/observer. Can you talk a little bit about that?

    Daniel Day-Lewis: I never thought about it like that, but it might be true. I’m probably not the best person to tell you, but, um, I guess I did always feel like a bit of an outsider, so maybe it’s found it’s way through to the work. I don’t know.

    Q: There’s a reference in the production notes about you spending several months thinking about whether you were going to do the film…

    DDL: I read the script many times over the years, more than I’ll ever read any script. Rebecca had sent it to me about ten years ago, before we’d met. And then over the years she worked on it, and we looked at it together a number of times. I thought I was reading it in an objective way, and I think I was most of those years. And then somehow it got inside of me, to the point that there was no avoiding it.

    Q: Is it something personal?

    DDL: It’s always something personal, but you don’t know exactly what it is, you can’t really explain it. Or if you could you wouldn’t try to, it could be a moment in time that’s unrepeatable…

    Catherine Keener: Do you often not look at scripts?

    Catherine Keener in 'The Ballad of Jack & Rose'
    Catherine Keener in ‘The Ballad of Jack & Rose’

    DDL: You mean when I’m working?

    CK: Yeah.

    DDL: I usually look at them a lot in the early stages, and then not at all for a long time. How about you?

    CK: It’s about the same.

    Q: Why, do you want to keep it fresh?

    DDL: Most of what still needs to be discovered lies outside, beyond the script itself. The script, if you like it, which you usually do, will take care of itself.

    Q: Can you talk about the location?

    DDL: It’s rare. It was a rare time. Rebecca loves working with actors, and I think she understands extremely well the environment they work best, how to create an environment that she knows is going to get the more decent creative possibilities.

    CK: It was very exciting time. The light was otherworldly, the terrain, you’d just get lost, everything was just completely different. Very beautiful. An incredibly special place.

    Q: Why were you drawn to playing Jack?

    DDL: The reason I was interested in Jack, and it would be the same reason I’d be interested in any piece of work, I suppose, is that he seemed to belong to a world I didn’t understand, and that he was a mystery to me. Now that may be unusual (laughs) and that’s what I begin with, I’m gathering him into myself, purely for the intention of exploring (chuckle) these dark and terrible things, but I don’t think so.

    Q: Was it ever awkward or difficult working with Rebecca, your wife? Were there ever times when she’d say “c’mon honey, one more take?”

    DDL: I don’t think she ever used the word ‘honey’ on the set! (laughs) No. It was outrageously easy.

    CK: It was fantastic. Rebecca was extremely fluid for everyone. Everyone was sort of in the same place, and that had a lot to do with the environment.

    Q: Rebecca said the idea for the script had to do in part with fear of a loved one dying. Her father passed away this year, and you were also very close to Mr. Miller. Did he pass away during the making of the movie?

    DDL: No. He was very much alive when we made that film. He was swimming in the sea in the film.

    Q: We asked Rebecca if there was one idea you could come away with from this story, and she said that love is complicated. Is there something you want viewers to come away with from this story?

    DDL: Perhaps if they were to have some animated conversation about the story! Most people would just leave the film, go home and go to bed… For the most part in film, judgments are made for you. But Rebecca refuses to pass judgment on any of the people, and that’s the way it should be.

    CK: I see this movie kind of through Camilla’s face, how she seems to be perceiving everything that’s happening to her. That’s the sort of impression I have from the film. Things happen that are very unsettling for her. But she walks away with this sense of beauty that was given to her by her father.

    Q: It’s a happy ending.

    DDL: It’s a hopeful ending, not necessarily a happy one.

    Q: And what about Kathleen?

    CK: That’s not a happy ending (laughs). She wants what everybody wants. She believes in love, and that maybe it’s still not out of her reach.

    Q: Were there scenes that were difficult to shoot?

    CK: Um, all of them! Yeah, they were difficult, there aren’t comedy tears, even though there’s supposed to be. No, they were all joyous to work out, but they were hard.

    Q: Have you watched the film with an audience?

    DDL: We had a screening at Woodstock, last weekend. I’d always been looking forward to that, and it was lovely, very warm, a good experience.

    Q: What was it like working with the rest of the young cast?

    CK: They were an inspiration, fun to be around, really hard workers.

    DDL: Each one of them is so rich, they’re not branded yet.

    Q: You’re not branded either.

    DDL: You discover these people in the story… the cycle of hope is coming to end, the urgency for the commune, this unachievable hope for future, but it seems to me, you see these young people dedicated to what they’re doing, love what they’re doing, and it makes you feel good.

    Q: Do they remind you of yourself at their age?

    DDL: I don’t think I had anything like the same kind of self-possession they have, which isn’t to say that they are probably beset by doubt, which they keep to themselves. I was probably more shambolic at their age.

  • Paul Bettany and Kirsten Dunst fault in ‘Wimbledon’

    Paul Bettany and Kirsten Dunst fault in ‘Wimbledon’

    Kirsten Dunst and Paul Bettany in 'Wimbledon'
    Kirsten Dunst and Paul Bettany in ‘Wimbledon’

    Despite their sunkissed faces and earnest performances, screen hottie Kirsten Dunst (Spiderman) and the blue-eyed, handsome Paul Bettany (A Beautfiul Mind) can’t make Wimbledon more than a run-of-the-mill, sugary romantic comedy.

    Admittedly, I’m not a die-hard tennis enthusiast. But somehow, even though I read that the film is from the same makers who brought us Bridget Jones’ Diary and Notting Hill, I went in thinking it might be somewhat more dramatic, especially given the caliber of the two main actors’ previous works. But the film doesn’t delve into the tennis player’s psyche, except on a superficial level. In the end, it is ultimately predictable.

    Kirsten Dunst and Paul Bettany in 'Wimbledon'
    Kirsten Dunst and Paul Bettany in ‘Wimbledon’

    The premise has universal appeal. Peter Colt (Bettany) seems to be past his prime, ready to throw in the towel with his tennis career regardless of how his performance at Wimbledon goes. Formerly ranked the 11th best tennis player in the world, Colt has slipped down a long way to 119th and is now a wild card. After accepting a position as a tennis director at an old fogies club, Colt faces a life crisis.

    Dunst is rising tennis star Lizzie Bradbury, who Colt first sees lathering up in a suite he is mistakenly sent to at The Dorchester. While they look great together and their chemistry is natural, it’s not passionate enough to deem a true love match. A firecracker on the court, Lizzie from the get-go insists that their fling be completely casual, no strings attached, so as not to disturb her game. Her protective dad/manager, played by Sam Neill, keeps an eye on her like a hawk. Colt agrees to the arrangement, but of course, he becomes increasingly enamored of her.

    Contrary to some sports pre-game protocols, their trysts prove beneficial — at least for Colt, who is now giving Britain a shot at being represented at Wimbledon. Surprising himself, Colt continues to win, beating his cute German friend Dieter and numerous other competitors, while Lizzie’s game gets, well, sloppy. Despite Lizzie switching hotels and telling Colt to cool it, he can’t — he’s lovesick, climbing up hotel facades to court his tennis queen.

    Kirsten Dunst finishes her shower in 'Wimbledon'
    Kirsten Dunst finishes her shower in ‘Wimbledon’

    There are cameos of tennis greats John McEnroe and Chris Evert as expert commentators at Wimbledon, along with Jon Favreau as a former agent that pops up like a gopher on a golf course when he sees Colt’s on a winning streak. Of course, he’s also Bradbury’s agent, so he lets Colt in on Lizzie’s whereabouts.

    I think if we had been given a chance to see more of Colt’s career, how he was in his ‘hungrier days’ as an up and coming pro, the film might have been more interesting. Special features on the DVD include “Wimbledon — A Look Inside” that’s interview snippets with the stars, “Welcome To The Club,” that explores tennis culture, “Coach A Rising Star,” that discusses the stars’ preparations for their roles (and the wonderful world of CGI), plus a feature commentary with Paul Bettany and director Richard Longcraine.

  • Q&A with Alejandro Amenabar and Javier Bardem

    Q&A with Alejandro Amenabar and Javier Bardem

    Alejandro Amenabar with Javier Bardem on the set of 'The Sea Inside'
    Alejandro Amenabar with Javier Bardem on the set of ‘The Sea Inside’

    The following is from a Q&A session with Alejandro Amenabar, director of The Sea Inside, and the starring actor, Javier Bardem, during a roundtable discussion at the Drake Hotel on December 15th.

    We first met with softspoken Alejandro in a standing only room, as reporters covered the table before him with recorders. After about a half an hour, Javier came in to sit down. Dressed in a sports jacket and slacks, the handsome, tall actor was tired, but still very gregarious about the new film.

    At the end of each session, both gentlemen signed copies of the production notes for reporters. In the following questions, they discuss preparation for the film, its controversial subject matter and timeless relevance.

    ALEJANDRO AMENABAR, Director

    What motivated you to do this story, and give it this title?

    After I did The Others, I wanted to do something about the sea. And when I heard about his story and read Ramon’s book, “Letters From Hell,” I felt alive. I thought about this story, thinking, what would I do, if I were in his situation? I wanted to use the concept of the sea, entering his inner world.

    What happened when you approached Javier for the role of Ramon?

    I think he is one of the best actors in Spain. He considered it for a few weeks and I wanted him to really think about it. The main challenge in this role was that his performance be absolutely real.

    Can you talk a little bit about for preparing for Ramon’s death scene?

    Javier watched the actual footage of Ramon’s death, which was difficult, but he really worked very hard to prepare for that scene.

    Director Alejandro Amenabar on set of 'The Sea Inside'
    Director Alejandro Amenabar on set of ‘The Sea Inside’

    How long did it take to shoot that scene?

    It took about 6 minutes to shoot, 15 including technical directions. Initially, I wasn’t going to include it in the film. I was worried it might take away from the movie’s positive spirit, but, we kept in the end.

    What happened after he died? Did they try to hold anyone responsible?

    Ten thousand people had signed a petition, saying that they had something do to with his death.

    Have the laws changed now?

    Only slightly, but you’d still go to jail for helping someone die. Euthanasia is a very hot subject in Spain right now.

    Has Mr. Sampedro’s family seen the film?

    Yes, and they liked it very much. They are very supportive of the film.

    You not only co-wrote the screenplay, and directed the film, but wrote the score.

    I’m humming and singing all the time. Music was important in this movie. Sampedro liked opera, Julia liked classical, and for Rosa, we used Celtic music. But I am more comfortable directing than I am writing a screenplay or a score.

    You used a lot of the same crew on this film as Pedro Almodovar. What do you have to say about his work?

    I think he is one of Spain’s most important directors.

    What movies out now do you like?

    Sideways.

    JAVIER BARDEM, lead actor

    So how long did it take you to prepare for this role?

    I would say one month to think about it, read the books and see the documentary footage, two months rehearsing and talking to the people that knew him, working with Alejandro, and three months shooting. Six months.

    How much time did you actually spend lying in bed? Did you practice?

    Yeah. I would start being still, in the sofa, trying to talk to myself, trying to offer up different emotions, but I would realize I was moving. So I would put on a video camera and record myself, and try to be still, several hours a day. Before shooting, there were five hours of make up. Then there were the hours during shooting, plus the hours I’d go back to sleep in my own bed at night.

    Javier Bardem in 'The Sea Inside'
    Javier Bardem in ‘The Sea Inside’

    Had you read his story?

    I read the script and his two books, the poetry one, and the other one, that has letters and thoughts about important issues — life, death, sex, God, religion, family.

    Did this movie renew your respect for life?

    For human beings, not for life. Life is not an absolute value.

    If you were ever in Ramon’s situation would you want to die?

    I cannot answer that, only that I hope not to be. It depends on so many things, how old I am, where I am, what are the circumstances, the people that surround me, how they’d react to that. But I am sure that if somebody I loved, asked me, what Ramon Sampedro was asking, and I am sure that it’s fully meditated, yeah, I would help them, even if it breaks my heart for the rest of my life.

    Did you get to talk with both of the women?

    I talked to Rosa, and with other family members. They all were very supportive during the making of this movie, they all saw how much respect Alejandro had for this project. They all saw the movie and loved it. They thought Ramon Sampedro’s spirit was in there.

    You also did some research visiting quadriplegics.

    I went to some of the hospitals, and spoke with five patients. They all knew Ramon Sampedro, but they all took the other attitude, which was to live. But they were very respectful of his decision, because they had been there, living it, they knew how hard it is, sometimes even wanting to go the other way. It was great for me to talk to them. In the end, they made me feel like I was the cripple, that I was the man not able to do anything, because they were so strong willed and so able. I have to respect them and their choices as much as Ramon Sampedro’s. But I’m not telling anyone what they should do and how they should feel.

    What was the challenge of writing with your mouth?

    I tried for two months, but I wasn’t able to even write my name. It’s impossible! You damage the muscles of the face, it hurts so much, you cannot talk.

    You were nominated for an Oscar four years ago, and you described it as being one of the worst experiences you ever had. Here you’re in this situation where you’re probably going to be nominated again…

    It’s not one of the worst, but… the awards here are very important, not so much in Spain. If the awards give these movies more recognition, more people will go and see it, and that’s good. I like this movie and I want people to go see it. But to get that, it’s very hard work, and I’m tired. On the other hand, with the Golden Globes, being with Leo di Caprio and Liam Neeson, it’s an honor. Awards can help your career, in theory. So, it’s not that bad, not that good, something in the middle. But it’s an honor.

    Do you see similarities between Ramon Sampedro and Renaldo Arenas?

    Both of them gave their lives for the same reason, which is freedom. They were prisoners of different institutions, religious and political, not allowed to be themselves, to express themselves. Somebody was dictating how they should behave. So yes, there are some similarities. But Renaldo was attacking, Ramon was reacting to what he sees.

    Did you do things to lighten up the mood on the set?

    Yeah. People get tired, not just me, but my colleagues, the crew. They wait a lot. Alejandro’s sense of humor helped us. Also, I had a fart machine, that was a present from Jo Allen. One day I put the machine in a bag and started to ring the button, and everyone was very polite. And I’d be like, man, please, react, do something! And they were like, oh, we thought it was the real thing.

    Were there any scenes that were emotionally difficult for you to shoot, such as the death scene?

    I was never overwhelmed by any of the emotions while doing the scenes. But I had to see the video of Ramon’s death, and it broke my heart, because I saw this man in agony for real, dying alone. I had to watch it, because it was necessary to get those details. In a way during the filming, I had to be detached.

    With Christopher Reeves’ passing and last year’s Barbarian Invasions, this issue keeps coming to the forefront. Do you feel it’s important to keep the dialogue going and will you do more after this is over with?

    Obviously people want to talk about it, there’s an interest in what’s going on with these issues. There’s so many problems in the world, and Gandhi says we have to become the change that we want for the world, so yes, let’s start to talk about it, at least. If we are talking about it and people are reacting like you are, then it’s important.

    What are you going to do now?

    I’m reading some stuff, but it’s up in the air. I’m not in a rush. I work every two years.

    What do you do in the time in between?

    Normal things, read, go see my friends, take a walk, have a drink, go back to my acting school, I try to go there six months every year. I’ve been going for the past 13 years.

    Do you have any interest in writing or directing?

    No, I think I have enough with my own ego to not have to deal with 50 others.

    What was your take on Amenabar’s direction? 

    I thought he would be more inexperienced. Why? Because the three stories he did up ‘til now, the weight of the stories relied more on the plot, or the way they were shot. This story was character driven, and about a subject matter that people react to, and I was surprised at how much he knew about acting, how to take you to the right place, with few words.